- #Publisher for mac users mac os x#
- #Publisher for mac users manuals#
- #Publisher for mac users install#
- #Publisher for mac users software#
- #Publisher for mac users professional#
This is something that a lot of people do after they convert over from Windows to Mac, because they feel lost without the BSD (Blue Screens of Death) and the constant security messages.
#Publisher for mac users install#
The answer is that you cannot really do this unless you have a virtual windows machine running in your Mac. How do I open some Microsoft Publisher files with the. For now I will stick with the surprisingly good MultiAd Creator.I was asked the question today. I hope that they end up making it a great competitor to Quark. Scribus should and could be a great product and it appears to be very comprehensive, but it need LOTS of help to make it rationally easy to install and use for even the above average user.Ī lot of good work has gone into Scribus. I found Scribus to be unnecessarily difficult and illogical.
#Publisher for mac users manuals#
And, I've used Quark since it's intro, Pagemaker, MultiAd Creator, and other DTP programs and have rarely needed to consult their manuals and am very schooled on DTP. I'm a programmer and run web servers so I am somewhat used to the "logic" and assumptions of the open source and UNIX world.
It is incredible that you have to change the text's characteristics in a one window and then go back to the main window to see the effect. So, I just tried to create my own document from scratch and almost immediately got the error, 'The application "pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode" failed to start! Please check the path:' Huh?Ĭontinuing on, I found that the interface was stunning stupid for some tasks, especially related to text. After lots of research and trials, I gave up. This is a classic case of open source assuming that everyone is a UNIX or LINUX geek. They were easy to find, but the instructions were either missing, utterly cryptic, or wrong. Finally, I finally found an easy Mac version, but why in the hell wasn't it mentioned at the various websites for GhostScript and Scribus! Most versions are a pain to install, having to run UNIX scripts and finding out that additional pieces are needed part way through the install forcing one to start over. Just try to find an easy to install version of GhostScript. At first, it needed GhostScript to import EPS and PDF. At first, it looked pretty good - nice logo decent layout, but it all went waaaaaay downhill from there. I really wanted to like this program, but now have mostly disdain for it.
#Publisher for mac users software#
If you need to create printable PDFs and you do not want to invest in expensive software like Adobe InDesign, then this is worth looking at. You might be more pleased with Apple's Pages.
#Publisher for mac users professional#
If you do not bring your files to a professional printer often, then this software might not be for you. Scribus has a strong development community, which offers continuous support since many years. Of course, we all would like to see every month a new final release, but the available resources are limited. But, as true for many open source projects, its development cycles could be shorter. It is really impressive what Scribus brings you for nothing. Scribus is open source and comes for free. I printed a lot of flyers and smaller books with it and was always impressed by its feature set.ģ. But when you start to manage it, it is of real value. As with any professional software it has its complexity and learning curve.
#Publisher for mac users mac os x#
It is a disadvantage as you cannot expect a native Mac OS X user interface.Ģ. It is an advantage as you can move its document files across different operating systems and the result will still look the same (try this with a MS product). This is its main advantage and its main disadvantage. Scribus is cross-platform (Linux, Windows, Mac OS X). To really understand its value we must look at it pros and cons.ġ. It really needs to from install all the way to advanced work. But hopefully by the time that switch becomes reality, it will have improved. Scribus would be the best choice for sparse DTP needs. Still, I will keep working at this one, as one day I hope to switch to Linux fully and slave other OSes. well, just bad compared to programs of a similar focus. Constantly switching panes to set different things in just one paragraph, section, and/or page was tedious at times. Things that should be simple, such as inline / inlayout editing, are not. While Scribus is not that bad, I would not call it good and would not recommend it to anyone unfamiliar with DTP. I have used many moderate to top of the line DTP applications, all the way to the nightmare that is the industrial strength InDesign CC. I give high marks on that last part, but as to the rest. to some success on some minor projects for output to PDF. I have finally installed and used this one.
0 kommentar(er)
